LIVE Loading prices… NEW How Do Stablecoins Make Money? And Why Most Can't Pay You Interest Central bank and fintech headlines ↗
Free tool · Copy That Clears Studio

Meta and Google ad policy checker

Paste your ad copy, pick your industry and see which words could get it rejected on Meta or Google. Every flag shows the rule behind it, a source, and a real case where a similar ad was banned or fined. The data covers 26 industries, from finance and gambling to FMCG and luxury.

26industries
354flagged phrases
101case studies
251dated policy events
Platform

Runs in your browser. Nothing you paste is sent or stored.

Your report appears here.Each flag shows the phrase, the rule behind it, a source and a real case where a similar ad got in trouble.

This tool is a pre-launch screen, not legal advice. Meta and Google do not publish banned-word lists, so each flag is a risk signal tied to a published rule, regulator ruling or court case. Policies change often. Data last checked 5 October 2026.

By industry

Ad rules for 26 industries

Each page covers Meta and Google rules, flagged words, risky creative, safer rewrites, policy history and case studies, with notes for the US, UK, EU, UAE and India.

Finance

Regulated vices

Health and beauty

Everyday consumer

Every industry

Rules that trip up any advertiser

These platform-wide rules cause rejections and limited delivery no matter what you sell.

Meta

Privacy Violations and Personal Attributes

Ads must not contain content that asserts or implies personal attributes: race, ethnicity, religion, beliefs, age, sexual orientation or practices, gender identity, disability, physical or mental health (incl. medical conditions), vulnerable financial status, voting status, trade union membership, criminal record, or name. Ads also must not share or ask for private information.

Examples that break it: Meet other black singles near you! Are you Christian? Meet other Buddhists Meet other seniors Are you 18 years old?

transparency.meta.com

Lead Ads restricted questions

Without prior written permission, lead ad forms cannot ask for: account numbers, criminal or arrest history, financial info (bank or card numbers, credit scores, income, net worth, debt, bankruptcy), government IDs, health info (physical or mental health, conditions, disabilities), or insurance info.

transparency.meta.com

Violent and Graphic Content (shocking/sensational)

Ads must not contain shocking, sensational or excessively violent content. Content deemed sensitive or not recommended to users cannot run as an ad.

Examples that break it: imagery of visible innards/exposed organs, bones, muscle even in health contexts (e.g., cigarette warnings) firearms, bladed weapons or explosives pointed directly at the viewer (incl. photorealistic fictional imagery unless a movie poster)

transparency.meta.com

Low quality or disruptive content (ad + post-click)

Violating ads are rejected. Ads that don't violate but have low-quality attributes become less competitive in the auction (higher cost, fewer results). Repeated violations can lower the quality rating of the Page, domain, ad account or associated entities.

facebook.com

Profanity (Profane & Sexual Language) incl. non-standard text

Ads must not contain profanity, including profanity that is obscured, misspelled or written with symbols or emojis, and profane gestures. Profane or sexual language outside the limited allowed cases must target 18+.

transparency.meta.com

Health and Wellness: negative self-perception, before/after, unrealistic claims

Ads for weight loss/gain, dietary/health supplements and cosmetic procedures must target 18+. These ads cannot: make statements of inferiority about appearance (negative terms or questions attacking appearance, body parts or hygiene), show close-ups of pinched fat, claim results from wearables alone, promote permanent skin whitening/bleaching, claim to cure the listed incurable diseases (Diabetes, Herpes, Thyroid, Psoriasis, Ebola, Cancer, Autism, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, ALS, HIV), or use clickbait in a health context (sensational language, extreme claims, specific outcomes in a set timeframe without disclaimers).

transparency.meta.com

Prohibited Commercial Practices (formerly 'Unacceptable Business Practices', old URL redirects)

Ads must comply with the Community Standard on Prohibited Commercial Practices: no deceptive pricing, unauthorized endorsements, guaranteed investment returns, or scams for money/personal info.

transparency.meta.com

Misinformation

Ads cannot include content debunked by third-party fact checkers or misinformation that violates the Community Standards. Advertisers who repeatedly post false information may be restricted from advertising.

transparency.meta.com

Spam / Inauthentic Behavior / Circumventing systems

Ads must not share deceptive links or buy, sell or exchange platform assets, features or engagement. Advertisers cannot use inauthentic assets (including business manager accounts) to deceive about identity, origin, popularity or purpose, or to evade enforcement. Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior is banned.

transparency.meta.com

Ads about Social Issues, Elections or Politics

Advertisers located in or targeting designated countries must complete authorization and carry a verified 'Paid for by' disclaimer. Ads missing the disclaimer are disapproved and added to the Ad Library. Photorealistic AI-generated or AI-altered media in these ads must be disclosed. From early Oct 2025, SIEP ads are not allowed in the EU, except voting information from election authorities. In the US, Brazil, India, Israel, Mexico and the UK, ads must not discourage voting, question an election's legitimacy, or claim victory early. From June 1, 2026, Meta also detects third-party GenAI media automatically and shows an 'AI Info' label.

transparency.meta.com

Special Ad Categories (housing, employment, financial products & services, SIEP)

Advertisers must declare a Special Ad Category. Housing, employment and financial ads get limited audience tools. Since Jan 21, 2025, 'Financial products and services' has replaced 'Credit' and is required for US-based advertisers or US audiences. The Discriminatory Practices policy bans wrongful targeting or exclusion.

facebook.com

Commercial Exploitation of Crises and Controversial Events

Ads must not exploit crises or controversial events for commercial purposes.

transparency.meta.com

Google

Misrepresentation: Unacceptable business practices

Not allowed: implying support from another brand, organization or government when untrue, offering products you can't deliver or aren't licensed for, lying about health or safety services, impersonating brands. These are egregious violations: suspension without prior warning.

support.google.com

Coordinated deceptive practices

Coordinating with other sites/accounts while concealing/misrepresenting identity (esp. political/social content, cross-border). Egregious.

support.google.com

Dishonest pricing practices

Must disclose the total price incl. taxes, fees and surcharges, the payment model, recurring costs and billing interval, shipping (incl. returns), interest rates, late fees and premium-rate call charges. Not allowed: bait-and-switch, price exploitation, calling apps 'free' when they cost to install, free trials without the trial period or auto-charge disclosed. 7-day warning before suspension.

support.google.com

Clickbait ads

Not allowed: ads claiming to reveal secrets or scandals, clickbait like 'Click here to find out' or 'You won't believe what happened', altered zoomed-in body parts, mugshots, accident or disaster photos, 'before and after' images promoting significant body alterations, pressuring purchase to avoid harm, depictions of severe distress, pain, fear or shock. Clickbait is on the strike-system policy list.

support.google.com

Misleading ad design

Not allowed: non-functional elements that look like buttons, input fields or multiple choice, misleading icons or arrows, designs mimicking system notifications or dialogs, ads that don't match the landing page, ads not clearly marked as ads. Strike-system policy.

support.google.com

Unreliable claims

Not allowed: unproven cures ('miracle cures', 'cure-all'), unrealistic weight loss in a set time or with little effort (e.g., 'eat whatever you want and lose 10 pounds in a month'), harmful health claims that contradict scientific consensus (anti-vaccine, conversion therapy), get-rich-quick, guaranteed or risk-free returns, demonstrably false claims about elections or democratic processes, claims contradicting climate consensus. Guaranteed results need an accessible refund policy. Testimonials claiming specific results need a 'results vary/no guarantee' disclaimer.

support.google.com

Unclear relevance

Not allowed: keyword insertion without a relevant default, irrelevant titles, ads that don't describe the destination, keyword spam.

support.google.com

Editorial: Capitalization

No excessive/gimmicky capitalization ('FLOWERS', 'FlOwErS', 'F.L.O.W.E.R.S'). Exceptions: common abbreviations (ASAP), coupon codes, brand/trademark names (review may be needed). 7-day warning before suspension.

support.google.com

Editorial: Punctuation and symbols

Not allowed: repeated punctuation ('flowers!!'), symbols replacing letters ('f1owers', 'fl@wers'), non-standard superscripts, bullet or asterisk decoration ('*flowers*'), gimmicky 'F.L.O.W.E.R.S.', unsupported characters incl. emoji and single-byte katakana. Allowed: '5* hotel', an asterisk to flag legal conditions.

support.google.com

Editorial: Style and spelling

Not allowed: non-standard grammar or spelling ('Flowers here buy', 'Buy flwres here'), gibberish, overly generic text or vague promotions, cut-off text, bullet points or numbered lists, a generic CTA like 'click here' that could apply to any ad.

support.google.com

Editorial: Phone number in ad text

No phone numbers in ad text (e.g., 'Call 1-800-123-4567'), use call assets or call-only ads.

support.google.com

Editorial: Repetition and spacing

No gimmicky repetition of advertiser/product names, no missing/extra spacing ('Sale,buy flowers', 'buyflowershere', 'f l o w e r s').

support.google.com

Destination requirements

Disapproval reasons: destination not working, mismatch between display and final URL, not crawlable by AdsBot, not accessible in the target location, poor destination experience (navigation, safety), insufficient original content, app/web store violations, unacceptable URL, unverified or unacceptable phone numbers. 7-day warning before suspension.

support.google.com

Trademarks

Enforced on complaint. Google restricts trademarks in ad text when used by direct competitors or in confusing or deceptive ways. It does NOT restrict trademarks as keywords or in the display-URL domain. Resellers and informational sites may use them descriptively if they make their role clear.

support.google.com

History

How ad policy changed, 2000 to 2026

  1. Google

    AdWords self-service launched (beta earlier Oct 2000).

    googlepress.blogspot.com

  2. Facebook

    Facebook Ads unveiled.

    about.fb.com

  3. Google

    $500M forfeiture to DOJ over Canadian online pharmacy ads targeting the US. Google agreed to require pharmacy certification (VIPPS) and other compliance measures.

    justice.gov

  4. Google

    Payday loan ad ban: no loans with repayment due within 60 days, US loans with APR >=36% banned.

    blog.google

  5. Google

    Identity verification required for US election advertisers (later 30+ countries).

    blog.google

  6. Facebook

    New policy banning ads for binary options, ICOs and cryptocurrency.

    facebook.com

  7. Google

    Google reported removing 3.2B bad ads in 2017 and announced policy updates on speculative financial products (binary options, crypto). The restricted financial products policy took effect June 2018.

    blog.google

  8. Facebook

    After Cambridge Analytica: announced authorization for political and issue advertisers, plus Page transparency.

    about.fb.com

  9. Facebook

    US political and issue ads now require 'Paid for by' labels and go into a searchable archive (7-year retention). Enforcement started.

    about.fb.com

  10. Facebook

    Settlements with civil-rights groups (NFHA, ACLU, CWA): housing, employment and credit ads lose age, gender, ZIP and protected-class detailed targeting. This is the origin of Special Ad Categories.

    about.fb.com

  11. Facebook

    HUD charges Facebook with Fair Housing Act violations, same day Facebook expands Ad Library to all active ads.

    archives.hud.gov

  12. Facebook

    FTC $5B privacy penalty (violation of 2012 order).

    ftc.gov

  13. Google

    Identity verification extended to all advertisers.

    blog.google

  14. Facebook

    20% image-text penalty removed from auction/delivery.

    socialmediatoday.com

  15. Apple (affects Meta)

    Apple notice: with the iOS 14.5 public release, apps must use AppTrackingTransparency to track users or access the IDFA.

    developer.apple.com

  16. Regulator (India)

    ASCI influencer guidelines apply.

    inc42.com

  17. Google

    Strike-based enforcement begins (announced July 2021), ramping over 3 months.

    support.google.com

  18. Meta

    Sensitive Detailed Targeting options removed: health causes, sexual orientation, religion, political beliefs, and race or ethnicity related options.

    facebook.com

  19. Meta

    DOJ settlement: Special Ad Audience discontinued for housing by Dec 31, 2022, a Variance Reduction System for fairer delivery, $115,054 penalty.

    justice.gov

  20. Regulator (US)

    FTC revised Endorsement Guides.

    ftc.gov

  21. Google

    Limited Ads Serving policy announced.

    searchengineland.com

  22. Regulator (EU)

    DSA applies to all online platforms (ad labelling, no sensitive-data or minor profiling ads).

    eur-lex.europa.eu

  23. Regulator (US)

    FTC final rule banning fake reviews and testimonials.

    ftc.gov

  24. Meta

    Meta starts testing facial recognition against celeb-bait scam ads. Expanded to UK/EU/South Korea Mar 4, 2025.

    about.fb.com

  25. Google

    Google announces it will stop serving political ads in the EU before TTPA (Oct 2025).

    blog.google

  26. Meta

    Andromeda ads retrieval engine disclosed.

    engineering.fb.com

  27. Meta

    Reported: data-sharing restrictions for health & wellness and financial advertisers (Core setup, restricted lower-funnel events).

    searchengineland.com

  28. Meta

    'Financial products and services' Special Ad Category required (replaces Credit) for US advertisers/audiences.

    facebook.com

  29. Meta

    Meta sues Joy Timeline HK (CrushAI nudify apps) for repeatedly circumventing ad review.

    about.fb.com

  30. Regulator (UAE)

    UAE Media Council launches Advertiser Permit (mandatory after 3 months).

    thenationalnews.com

  31. Meta

    Political, electoral and social-issue ads end in the EU (TTPA).

    about.fb.com

  32. Meta

    Meta starts auto-detecting third-party GenAI media in SIEP ads and adds an 'AI Info' label.

    transparency.meta.com

Case library

101 real cases, newest first

Regulator rulings, fines and lawsuits involving ads. Each one shows what the ad said, what happened and the lesson.

101 cases

FCA v 7 influencers (incl. Lauren Goodger, Yazmin Oukhellou)

The adInstagram promotion of an unauthorised forex trading scheme (4.5M combined followers)

OutcomeFines up to £3,750 plus costs, discharges

LessonInfluencers are criminally liable for unauthorised financial promotions

fca.org.uk

FCA-led global finfluencer week (17 regulators)

The ad1,267 illegal financial ads on Meta, 66% from firms already on the FCA Warning List

Outcome120 takedown requests, Aaron Chalmers guilty plea

LessonPlatform policy alone is not enough, FCA checks the Warning List

fca.org.uk

FCA review of Meta (Nov 2025 week)

The ad1,052 FX and complex-instrument ads from unauthorised advertisers, despite Meta's 2022 pledge to allow only FCA-authorised firms

OutcomePublic criticism, 56% repeat offenders

LessonExpect UK scrutiny of FX/CFD ads on Meta

thestandard.com.hk

ASA v Mark Anthony Brands (UK) t/a White Claw UK

The adInstagram 'WAVEMAKERS' highlight reposting young people's photos with cans, incl. '#studentwavemaker'

OutcomeUpheld. Must not feature people who are or look under 25. Found by ASA AI monitoring.

LessonReposted UGC is your ad. Age-check everyone in it.

asa.org.uk

ASA v S&E1 (Morley's Woking)

The adPaid Instagram combo-meal ad

OutcomeUpheld 8 Jul 2026, SME exemption did not apply (parent has >250 staff)

LessonCheck group headcount before relying on the SME exemption

asa.org.uk

CMA v Emma Sleep

The adCountdown timers, 'High Demand' messages, fake time-limited sales

OutcomeCourt-endorsed undertakings 22 May 2026, was/now pricing sent to trial

LessonUrgency must be real, reference prices are litigated separately

gov.uk

2025Cross-industry

Meta v. Joy Timeline HK Ltd (CrushAI)

OutcomeLawsuit filed in Hong Kong (announced June 12, 2025) to stop nudify-app ads after repeated attempts to get around ad review. Meta also added detection for such ads even when they contain no nudity, and matching for copycat ads.

LessonCircumventing ad review (benign creatives, rotating domains) escalates from account bans to litigation.

about.fb.com

FCA (2024 data)

The adDebt-solution, crypto and claims-management promotions

Outcome19,766 promotions amended or withdrawn in 2024, 2,240 alerts on unauthorised firms

LessonUK debt and credit promotions are actively policed

fca.org.uk

ASA v Trip Drinks Ltd (TRIP)

The adWebsite: 'help find some calm', '95% felt calmer', cortisol study claims

OutcomeAll 3 issues upheld. No disease or unauthorised health claims.

Lesson'Calm' and stress claims on CBD or functional drinks count as health claims in the UK.

asa.org.uk

FTC v Match Group

The adFree 6-month subscription if users did not 'meet someone special', with undisclosed onerous conditions

Outcome$14M. Must clearly disclose guarantee terms and simplify cancellation.

LessonGuarantee and 'free' offers need conspicuous conditions.

ftc.gov

ASA v. Yazen and 8 other advertisers (UK)

The ad"Obesity treatment jab", "Weight loss pen", GLP-1 references, injection-pen imagery

Outcome9 complaints upheld. Indirect promotion of POMs is banned even without a brand name.

LessonPromote the consultation, not the drug or its delivery method.

aestheticsjournal.com

FTC v. NextMed (Southern Health Solutions)

The adHidden GLP-1 costs, unsubstantiated weight-loss claims, fake reviews

OutcomeConsent order and $150K

LessonTelehealth GLP-1 ads need clear all-in pricing, real reviews and substantiation.

ftc.gov

FDA v. Hims & Hers and other telehealth firms

The adCompounded semaglutide/tirzepatide marketed as equivalent to Wegovy or Ozempic

OutcomeWarning letters citing FD&C Act 502(a) and 502(bb). 15 working days to respond.

LessonNever claim FDA approval or sameness for compounded drugs.

techtarget.com

ASA v Kenvue (Listerine)

The ad'PROVEN TO BE 5X MORE EFFECTIVE THAN FLOSS'

OutcomeUpheld 2 Jul 2025

LessonQualifiers cannot fix an efficacy claim that misleads overall

asa.org.uk

AGCM v Shein

The adRecyclability/circularity, sustainable lines

OutcomeEUR1m fine

LessonDo not generalise a small eco range to the whole brand

senecaesg.com

CMA v Wayfair, Appliances Direct, Marks Electrical, Gold's Gym, StubHub, viagogo, AA/BSM

The adDrip pricing, time-limited sales, opt-ins

OutcomeFirst DMCC investigations (fines up to 10% of turnover)

LessonThe UK direct-fining regime is now live

hsfkramer.com

CMA v Amazon

The adFake reviews, catalogue abuse

OutcomeUndertakings 6 Jun 2025

LessonPlatforms must detect and sanction review abuse

gov.uk

ASA v Travelodge

The ad'From GBP25', 'From GBP21'

OutcomeUpheld 19 Nov 2025

LessonSpread 'from' price availability across dates

asa.org.uk

FTC junk fees rule

The adBase-rate lodging ads

OutcomeTotal price must be most prominent, up to US$51,744 per violation

LessonUS lodging ads must lead with the all-in price

btlaw.com

ASA v Self Made Girl Boss

The ad'GBP20-30k a month', 'free... course'

OutcomeUpheld

LessonDisclaimers must be prominent and must not contradict the headline

asa.org.uk

ASA v Zimran (Prosperi Academy)

The ad'START WITH $20', millionaire framing

OutcomeUpheld on 3 issues

LessonShow the risk, do not present simulated gains as real

asa.org.uk

2024Cross-industry

Meta (celebrity-bait scam enforcement)

OutcomeOct 21, 2024: Meta began testing facial recognition to detect celeb-bait scam ads, expanding to UK/EU/South Korea in Mar 2025. In a Sept 2025 update, Meta said testing more than doubled detection and about 500,000 public figures are protected.

LessonUsing celebrity likeness without authorization is detected automatically and treated as scam content.

about.fb.com

FTC v Simple Health Plans and Steven Dorfman

The adPromised 'comprehensive health insurance' covering pre-existing conditions, sold discount or limited plans

Outcome$195M judgment, permanent ban

LessonDon't label limited-benefit products as insurance

ftc.gov

Samantha Guery v DraftKings (S.D.N.Y. class action)

The ad'Risk-free' new-customer bet paid back in non-withdrawable bonus bets

OutcomeFiled Apr 2024. Alleges deceptive advertising. A separate Massachusetts class action over a '$1,000' bonus survived a motion to dismiss (reported Oct 2024). Final outcomes not verified.

LessonBonus-bet maths (a $100 free bet win nets about $91 vs about $191 in cash) drives deception claims.

sbcamericas.com

ASA v Acme Vape Ltd (IVG)

The adTikTok unboxing and 'IVG Bar Flavour Test Time!' posts

OutcomeUpheld (CAP 22.12). Not to be made from a public TikTok account.

LessonOld organic posts still count. Audit legacy social accounts.

asa.org.uk

ASA v Apollo Future Technology (Apollo Vapes UK)

The adWebsite 'Affiliate Program' recruiting online promoters with banners and links

OutcomeUpheld. No direct or indirect online promotion via affiliates.

LessonAffiliate recruitment itself can breach the rules.

asa.org.uk

FTC/DOJ v. Cerebral (telehealth)

The adShared sensitive health data with third parties for advertising. Misled users on cancellation.

OutcomeOrder bans use of health data for most ads. More than $7M.

LessonDo not use pixels or health data for ad targeting in telehealth.

ftc.gov

India Supreme Court, IMA v. Patanjali

The ad"permanent relief" and cures for diabetes, BP, asthma and other conditions

OutcomeContempt notice on 27 Feb 2024 and an ad restraint. Public apologies. Self-declarations required before broadcast ads (7 May 2024).

LessonDisease-cure claims for Schedule diseases are illegal in India.

livelaw.in

India Supreme Court, IMA v. Patanjali Ayurved

The adAyurvedic products giving "permanent relief" from diabetes, BP, asthma, glaucoma

OutcomeContempt proceedings, ad restraints, public apology. Self-declaration required for ads.

LessonDo not attach Schedule-disease claims to traditional or herbal products in India.

scobserver.in

FTC/DOJ v. Cerebral and its former CEO

The adDisclosed health data via tracking for ads. Misleading easy-cancel claims.

OutcomeMore than $7M and a ban on health data for most ads

LessonAudit tracking pixels. Make cancellation claims accurate.

ftc.gov

Chanel v What Goes Around Comes Around

The adChanel hashtags, 'COCO10' codes, authenticity guarantees

OutcomeLiable on all 4 claims incl. false advertising, US$4m

LessonResellers must not use brand indicia to imply affiliation or guarantee unverified authenticity

thefashionlaw.com

CJEU Aldi Sud

The ad% discount calculated against the previous day's price

OutcomeMust use the lowest price in the prior 30 days

LessonCalculate EU discounts from the 30-day low

curia.europa.eu

ASA v Mazda (Meta ad)

The ad'Exciting, efficient and sustainable'

OutcomeUpheld

LessonAvoid 'sustainable' for cars

asa.org.uk

FTC v Ascend Ecom / FBA Machine / Ecommerce Empire Builders

The adAI passive income, guaranteed income

OutcomeFederal lawsuits

LessonAI framing draws more scrutiny

akingump.com

2023Cross-industry

ASA v Shell UK

The ad'BRISTOL is READY for Cleaner Energy', renewables messaging

OutcomeUpheld in part 7 Jun 2023, left out that fossil fuels dominate the business

asa.org.uk

FTC v Lurn and Anik Singal

The ad'Stay-At-Home Millionaire', 'Fail 98% of the Time & Still... Make $11,453 Per Month'

Outcome$2.5M, $14.08M judgment (partly suspended), earnings-claim ban

LessonIgnoring the FTC notice raises exposure

ftc.gov

ASA v BV Gaming (BetVictor)

The adPaid Facebook ad showing Jordi Alba and Sergio Busquets: 'Who is the most underrated player at the club you support?'

OutcomeUpheld (CAP 16.3.12). Must not appear again.

LessonLower-profile or overseas players at top clubs can still have 'strong appeal'. Arguing 'medium risk' failed.

asa.org.uk

ASA v Hillside (UK Sports) ENC (bet365)

The adSky Sports PL tweet with a Granit Xhaka goal clip, carrying a bet365 Twitter Amplify pre-roll

OutcomeUpheld. Must not appear again.

LessonSponsored placements next to publisher content are judged as one ad. 25+ targeting did not save it. Found by ASA AI monitoring.

asa.org.uk

Ohio Casino Control Commission v DraftKings

The ad'Free' and 'risk-free' offers that put players' money at risk. Mailers reached under-21s. Problem-gambling messaging not clear.

Outcome$500,000 settlement approved 2023-02-15.

LessonUS state regulators fine 'risk-free' wording directly.

covers.com

FTC + FDA v 6 delta-8 THC edible sellers

The adPackaging almost identical to Doritos, Cheetos and Nerds

OutcomeCease-and-desist and warning letters

LessonChild-appealing trade dress is 'unfair and deceptive'.

ftc.gov

ASA v Action First Holding Ltd

The adDating ads with women in revealing tops, dresses and bikinis, one saying 'I just want friends with benefits'

OutcomeUpheld (irresponsibly targeted)

LessonNot explicit is not enough. Suggestive dating ads must be targeted.

asa.org.uk

ASA v Ann Summers Ltd

The adValentine's TV ad with Tasha Ghouri dancing in lingerie

OutcomeNot upheld (both issues)

LessonLingerie and sensual tone can pass when not explicit and properly scheduled. A benchmark for what is acceptable.

asa.org.uk

ASA v Polyverse Inc (AI Mirror)

The adIn-game ad showing a woman's partially exposed buttocks: 'Try this Ai effect'

OutcomeUpheld (offence, irresponsible, poorly targeted). Agency upload and ad-network placement were no defence.

LessonAdvertisers are responsible for agency creatives and network placements.

asa.org.uk

FTC, about 670 marketers of OTC drugs, homeopathics, supplements and functional foods

The adHealth claims lacking substantiation, including "scientifically or clinically proven"

OutcomeNotices of Penalty Offenses. Civil penalties up to $50,120 per violation for future violations.

LessonHold RCT-grade substantiation before the ad runs.

ftc.gov

FTC v. BetterHelp

The adPromised privacy, then shared emails and intake data with Facebook for lookalike audiences

Outcome$7.8M refunds and a ban on sharing health data for ads

LessonNever build ad audiences from therapy intake data.

ftc.gov

Meta + Christian Louboutin v Mexican counterfeiter

The adCounterfeit Louboutins sold through dozens of fake FB/IG accounts

OutcomeRuled for plaintiffs 31 Mar 2026, platform ban

LessonPlatforms litigate against repeat counterfeit advertisers

about.fb.com

Hermes v Rothschild

The ad'MetaBirkins' NFTs

OutcomeInfringement, US$133k

LessonArtistic framing does not protect confusing brand use

paulweiss.com

ASA v Toyota

The adHilux 'Born to Roam' off-road footage

OutcomeBanned

LessonEnvironmental social responsibility applies to car ads

carscoops.com

2022Cross-industry

US DOJ v. Meta Platforms

OutcomeSettlement June 21, 2022: $115,054 penalty (the Fair Housing Act maximum). Special Ad Audience discontinued for housing. A Variance Reduction System for fairer ad delivery, under court oversight.

LessonEven neutral targeting inputs can produce discriminatory delivery, algorithms are in regulatory scope.

justice.gov

2022Cross-industry

ASA v HSBC UK

The ad$1tn net-zero financing, 2m trees

OutcomeBanned 18 Oct 2022, misleading because it left out the bank's own financed emissions

thedrum.com

SEC v Kim Kardashian

The adInstagram post for EMAX (EthereumMax) without disclosing $250k payment

Outcome$1.26M ($1M penalty plus ~$260k disgorgement), 3-year ban on promoting crypto securities

LessonDisclose the nature, source and amount of compensation

sec.gov

FTC v Benefytt Technologies

The adLead-gen sites such as Obamacareplans.com, plans pitched as ACA-qualified

Outcome$100M refunds, executive bans

LessonLead-gen domains and claims create liability

ftc.gov

US (DOJ/SDNY) v Meta

The adHousing ad delivery algorithm (Special Ad Audience)

Outcome$115,054 (FHA maximum) plus algorithm changes under court oversight

LessonDelivery bias counts, not just targeting

justice.gov

ASA v Enigmaa Ltd t/a Blessed CBD and Consumer Logic Research

The adAdvertorials on news sites: 'The 6 Best CBD Oils Reviewed' saying CBD helped with chronic pain, seizures, sleep disorders

OutcomeAll 5 issues upheld. Ads must be identifiable as ads, with no medicinal claims for unlicensed products.

LessonDisguised reviews plus medical claims is a double breach.

asa.org.uk

ASA v Get Hard Ltd

The adOutdoor poster for a sex-toy store: person in a gimp mask, peach and aubergine emojis, 'GET HARD' / 'ANYONE CAN GET INTO IT!'

OutcomeBoth issues upheld. Must not appear again in outdoor advertising.

LessonUntargeted out-of-home media needs a far tamer creative.

asa.org.uk

ASA v Oatly

The ad'73% less CO2e vs. milk' and dairy/meat emissions claims

Outcome4 of 5 claims misleading (27 Jan 2022)

LessonState the comparator and the LCA basis, do not edit expert quotes

beveragedaily.com

ASA v Innocent

The ad'Little drinks with big dreams for a healthier planet'

OutcomeUpheld 23 Feb 2022

LessonProducts sold in plastic bottles cannot imply a net benefit to the planet

asa.org.uk

ASA v Nutricia (Cow&Gate)

The adBaby-club podcast, A2 milk 'may be easier to digest'

OutcomeUpheld 23 Feb 2022

LessonIndirect infant formula ads and unauthorised claims are both breaches

asa.org.uk

Competition Bureau v Keurig Canada

The adK-Cup pods recyclable

OutcomeC$3m penalty + C$800k donation + corrective notices

Lesson'Recyclable' means accepted by real local programmes

canada.ca

FTC v Epic Games

The adFortnite purchase UI and default settings

OutcomeUS$275m COPPA penalty + US$245m refunds

LessonDark-pattern purchase flows aimed at kids are high-risk

ftc.gov

ASA v Luno

The adLondon Underground poster: 'If you're seeing Bitcoin on the Underground, it's time to buy'

OutcomeUpheld (CAP 3.1, 3.3, 14.4)

LessonState that value can fall, that crypto is unregulated, and don't imply it's easy

asa.org.uk

ASA v Payward (Kraken)

The adLondon Bridge digital poster: 'Buy 50+ crypto in minutes. Get started with as little as £10', warning shown for 1 second

OutcomeUpheld

LessonFlash warnings are not enough

asa.org.uk

ASA v Arsenal FC (Socios $AFC fan token)

The adFacebook post with players: 'Download the Socios app to get your token'

OutcomeUpheld, ruling dated 22 Dec 2021

LessonFan tokens are crypto, omitted risk and exchange-account info misleads

asa.org.uk

FTC Notice of Penalty Offenses

The adMLM, gig, coaching and franchise earnings claims

OutcomeCivil penalties possible for recipients

LessonPenalty-offense theory turns claims into fines

ftc.gov

ASA v Alpro

The ad'GOOD FOR THE PLANET'

OutcomeUpheld 20 Oct 2021

LessonMake the basis of comparison clear (vs dairy, not absolute)

asa.org.uk

2020Cross-industry

FTC v. Teami, LLC (+ warning letters to 10 influencers incl. Cardi B, Jordin Sparks)

OutcomeTeami made unsupported weight-loss and disease claims, and its paid influencers hid their disclosures behind 'more'. A $15.2M judgment was suspended on payment of $1M, and endorser monitoring was required.

LessonDisclosures must be visible without clicking 'more', brands are liable for influencer claims and disclosures.

ftc.gov

FTC v 6 CBD sellers incl. Bionatrol Health/Isle Revive (Operation CBDeceit)

The adClaims that oils, balms, gummies and coffee could treat cancer, heart disease, hypertension, Alzheimer's and more

OutcomeOrders to stop unsupported health claims. Several paid monetary judgments. Future claims need scientific evidence.

LessonDisease claims need competent and reliable scientific evidence.

ftc.gov

FTC v Career Education Corp

The adLead generators posing as military or job help

OutcomeUS$30m

LessonThe advertiser is liable for its affiliates' claims

ftc.gov

2019Cross-industry

NFHA/ACLU/CWA v. Facebook (settlement) and HUD charge v. Facebook

OutcomeThe Mar 19, 2019 settlements removed age, gender, ZIP and protected-class targeting for housing, employment and credit ads. HUD charged Facebook with Fair Housing Act violations on Mar 28, 2019.

LessonHousing/employment/finance ads require Special Ad Category, targeting itself can be discriminatory.

about.fb.com

2019Cross-industry

FTC v. Facebook

Outcome$5B penalty and privacy restructuring for violating a 2012 order, FTC separately acted against Cambridge Analytica.

LessonData-use promises are enforceable. This period led to political ad authorization and tighter targeting and data controls.

ftc.gov

2019Cross-industry

UK ASA ruling: Zoe de Pass t/a Dress Like A Mum (Air & Grace collaboration)

OutcomeUpheld on 20 Nov 2019, after an independent review reversed a 2018 decision. The Instagram post for a co-designed shoe range was not obviously identifiable as an ad, because the context only appeared after clicking 'more'. Breach of CAP rule 2.1.

LessonOwn-brand/collab posts are ads, label must be visible before engagement.

asa.org.uk

HUD v Facebook

The adTargeting tools that excluded parents, non-Christians, 'interested in Hispanic culture', and neighbourhoods by map

OutcomeCharge filed, later DOJ suit

LessonPlatform tools themselves can be discriminatory

archives.hud.gov

FTC + FDA v 4 flavored e-liquid sellers (e.g. Hype City Vapors, Solace Vapor)

The adInfluencer posts on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter endorsing e-liquids with no nicotine warning

OutcomeWarning letters. FDA found the products misbranded. FTC flagged failure to disclose health risks.

LessonInfluencer content counts as advertising and needs the warning.

ftc.gov

ASA v Boohoo / Zacharia Jewellers

The ad'faux fur' items containing real fur

OutcomeRulings led to the 2019 enforcement notice

LessonTest fur before labelling it

asa.org.uk

CMA v 6 hotel booking sites

The adPressure selling, misleading discounts, hidden charges, paid rankings

OutcomeCommitments

LessonPut mandatory fees in the headline price, keep scarcity claims honest

gov.uk

FTC v University of Phoenix

The adPartnerships with Microsoft, Twitter, Adobe and AT&T creating jobs

OutcomeUS$191m

LessonNo implied employer partnerships

ftc.gov

ASA v Bio-tiful Dairy

The ad'Naturally boosted digestion and immunity'

OutcomeUpheld 16 Aug 2017

LessonHealth claims must match authorised wording

asa.org.uk

FTC v Herbalife

The adTold people they could 'quit their jobs' and earn thousands a month, most sales leaders earned under $300 (2014)

Outcome$200M redress, 2/3 of rewards must come from retail sales, 7-year auditor

LessonLifestyle and income claims need typical-earnings substantiation

ftc.gov

FTC v 5 personal-care firms

The ad'All natural'/'100% natural' with dimethicone, phenoxyethanol etc.

Outcome4 settlements, 1 complaint

LessonAny synthetic ingredient defeats 'all natural'

ftc.gov

FTC/DOJ v Volkswagen

The ad'Clean diesel', low-emission

OutcomeUp to US$14.7bn

LessonGreen performance claims must hold true in real-world use

ftc.gov

ASA v Stop Go Networks t/a 'Rudolph's Readies'

The adBright cartoon Santa, reindeer and snowman for a Christmas loan brand

OutcomeUpheld as irresponsible

LessonThe name and imagery alone can trivialise credit

asa.org.uk

ASA v FCL Consumer Finance

The adPrize draw for students to win a term's rent if they took out a loan

OutcomeUpheld as irresponsible

LessonNo promotions that need borrowing to enter

asa.org.uk

FTC v. Sensa, L'Occitane, HCG Diet Direct, LeanSpa

The ad"sprinkle, eat, and lose weight", cream to "trim 1.3 inches in just 4 weeks", "Lose 7 pounds in 7 days"

Outcome$26.5M refunds from Sensa, $450K from L'Occitane, a $3.2M suspended judgment, and $7.3M in surrendered assets

LessonSpecific timeframes and effortless or topical claims need RCT proof.

ftc.gov

ASA v. HB Health (Knightsbridge) and Dermaskin Clinics

The adPromoted Botox on websites, including linked pages

OutcomeBanned under CAP 12.12

LessonRemoving the word "Botox" from the homepage is not enough if linked pages promote the POM.

asa.org.uk

Interflora v Marks & Spencer

The adBidding on the 'INTERFLORA' keyword

OutcomeInfringement (origin function)

LessonGoogle allows keyword bidding, but it can still infringe if the ad's origin is unclear

wiggin.co.uk

ASA v Weetabix (Weetakid app)

The ad'What?! No Weetabix?! Why make things harder for yourself?'

OutcomeUpheld

LessonAdvergames count as ads to children

asa.org.uk

ASA v Ariste Holding

The adStressed small loan amounts and speed

OutcomeUpheld

LessonCost must not be outweighed by speed claims

asa.org.uk

FTC (with 44 AGs/DC) v. Skechers USA

The adShape-ups would help people lose weight and tone buttocks, legs and abs

Outcome$40M settlement and consumer refunds

LessonFitness gear needs scientific proof for body-composition claims.

ftc.gov

2011Cross-industry

US DOJ v. Google

OutcomeGoogle forfeited $500M for knowingly letting Canadian online pharmacies target US users with AdWords since at least 2003, including helping them optimize ads. It agreed to VIPPS pharmacy certification and compliance monitoring.

LessonPlatforms (and advertisers) are liable for knowingly serving illegal regulated-product ads, certification gates exist because of this case.

justice.gov

2022-23 (ads seen Jul 2022; ruling date unverified)Alcohol

ASA v The Muff Liquor Company (Laura Whitmore posts)

The adInstagram/TikTok video of Whitmore dancing more energetically with each drink. Investor relationship not disclosed.

OutcomeTwo issues upheld, one upheld in part (ad ID and under-18 appeal/responsibility).

LessonDisclose influencer or investor ties. Don't show alcohol changing mood or behaviour.

asa.org.uk

US DOJ v. Google

The adAdWords ads from Canadian pharmacies aimed at US users

Outcome$500M forfeiture

LessonPlatforms are liable for pharmacy ads. This is why LegitScript and NABP gating exists.

justice.gov

ASA v. L'Oreal UK (Lancome Teint Miracle, Maybelline The Eraser). Complainant: Jo Swinson MP.

The adFoundation and anti-ageing efficacy shown on retouched celebrity images

OutcomeAds banned as "not representative of the results the product could achieve"

LessonDo not retouch the area the product claims to improve.

thedrum.com

ASA v Match.com

The ad'someone finds their match once every ten minutes'

OutcomeUpheld (misleading): the survey covered only paid subscribers

LessonSuccess-rate claims need representative data.

asa.org.uk

FAQ

Ad policy questions

Do Meta and Google have a list of banned words?

No. Neither platform publishes a banned-word list. Ads get rejected for what the words claim or imply, such as guaranteed results, health cures or personal attributes. This tool maps common phrases to the published rules and real cases behind them.

Why does Meta reject ads that say 'Are you...'?

Meta's Personal Attributes policy bans ads that assert or imply someone's health, finances, age, religion, sexuality or other personal traits. 'Are you in debt?' or 'Do you have diabetes?' breaks it. Rephrase around the product, such as 'Explore debt management options'.

Which industries need authorization to advertise?

Gambling, crypto exchanges, online pharmacies and telehealth, addiction treatment and some financial products need written permission, certification or a licence before ads run. Rules differ by country, so check the industry page for each market.

Can an ad pass review and still break the law?

Yes. Platform approval does not mean an ad meets regulator rules. Bodies like the UK ASA, US FTC and UAE regulators can still act against ads that ran without problems on Meta or Google.

How often is the data updated?

The data was last checked on 5 October 2026. Every rule links to its source so you can confirm the current wording before you launch.

How we built this

We read Meta's Advertising Standards, Google Ads policies and Merchant Center rules, then matched them with rulings and guidance from the UK ASA and CAP Code, the US FTC, FDA and CFPB, the FCA, ESMA, India's ASCI and SEBI, and UAE regulators including VARA and the UAE Media Council. Each flagged phrase links to the rule or case that makes it risky. Where a flag is our reading of a rule rather than a named example, we mark it as lower severity.

This tool is a pre-launch screen, not legal advice. Meta and Google do not publish banned-word lists, so each flag is a risk signal tied to a published rule, regulator ruling or court case. Policies change often. Data last checked 5 October 2026.